Re: [whatwg/fetch] Refreshing of stale response assumed to always be successful (#950) from Gregory Terzian on 2020-06-25 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from June 2020)

From: Gregory Terzian <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:16:29 -0700
To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/950/649668502@github.com>

Ok so on second thoughts, I think the fetch wording is actually pretty good as is. The 304 is handled explicitly, and the other cases are dealt with implicitly with Step 7.5, which would also cover the server error case(which would be forwarded as the response). 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/950#issuecomment-649668502

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2020 16:16:41 UTC