[w3ctag/design-reviews] Geolocation API (#529)

Saluton TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of [Geolocation API](https://w3c.github.io/geolocation-api/).

This specification defines an API that provides scripted access to geographical location information associated with the hosting device. It is now maintained by the Devices and Sensors WG, and contains the following substantive changes since the last REC:

* [Now Controlled by feature policy](https://github.com/w3c/geolocation-api/pull/41)
* [Fixed confusion around callback interfaces not being an EventHandler](https://github.com/w3c/geolocation-api/pull/39)
* Only expose the API in SecureContexts
* [Renamed](https://github.com/w3c/geolocation-api/pull/23) the interfaces and dictionaries + removal of `[NoInterfaceObject]` + `[SameObject]` annotation on geolocation attribute

-----

  - Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/geolocation-api/

  - Tests: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/geolocation-API

  - Security and Privacy self-review: https://w3c.github.io/geolocation-api/#security

  - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/geolocation-api

  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
      - Anssi Kostiainen (@anssiko), Intel
      - Fuqiao Xue (@xfq), W3C
      - Reilly Grant (@reillyeon), Google
  - Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: Devices and Sensors Working Group
  - External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status):
    - [Geolocation](https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6348855016685568)
    - [Remove geolocation from Insecure Contexts](https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5636088701911040)
    - [Feature Policy](https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5190687460950016)
    - [Remove NoInterfaceObject](https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5172722929762304)

Further details:

  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/)
  - The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: [W3C DAS WG](https://www.w3.org/das/)
  - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: no known issues

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as:

  ☂️ open a single issue in our GitHub repo **for the entire review**


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/529