- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:23:56 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2020 21:24:09 UTC
Oh, sure, that's true. Then we'd need to manually copy the three items over from the (chunkSteps, doneSteps, errorSteps) tuple into the read request tuple, which would slightly decrease the benefit of keeping them together, but we're already doing that anyway with them as separate parameters. So I think it would indeed be a strict improvement. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/1045#issuecomment-648435821
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2020 21:24:09 UTC