- From: Adam Rice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 02:47:24 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2020 09:47:36 UTC
This is better than I expected. This pretty closely reflects what we'll need to do to optimise pipeTo() anyway, so having the timing match up with the standard is useful. I need to think a bit more about the (chunkSteps, doneSteps, errorSteps) tuple. I think this is worth pursuing, and I'm in favour of it provided we can make it work. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/1045#issuecomment-648033985
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2020 09:47:36 UTC