Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Record and Tuple ECMAScript Proposal (#518)

Hi,

We discussed this proposal in a TAG breakout today, and overall, we're really happy with this proposal. We're particularly impressed with the comprehensiveness of the explainer. We should consider adding a Glossary section to our explainer explainer based on your work here.

Prior to this TAG review, I noted the naming clash with WebIDL. We're confident that both you folks and WebIDL folks have that well in hand. We wonder if both WebIDL and TC39 could proactively look for such naming collisions when beginning new work.

Thanks so much for bringing this to us. If your design significantly changes due to other feedback, we'd love to take another look.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/518#issuecomment-644247647