Re: [whatwg/dom] Trouble understanding a parable of specification, under the "ensure pre-insertion validity" list of steps (#870)

Thank you for thorough explanation. I have no issues with authors assuming an accepted convention such as Oxford commas. To that end, I think this issue can be closed, for my part at least. I will have to learn Oxford commas thoroughly and keep these in mind reading WHATWG documents in depth :)

However, perhaps linking a "how to interpret the specification(s)"-kind of a document could be a thing to consider? It's hard for me to judge merits of such a thing -- the sentence in question may only be hard enough to interpret for a minority of people, like me.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/870#issuecomment-642837127