Re: [w3c/editing] Readd links to moved files (#262)

> if the new structure works better for you and the task force

This seems to be the case for those participating in the task force that have voiced an opinion about this so far. The new structure also works for me but I'd also be willing to move to some third structure if there was strong opinion about that in the taskforce.

As for whether to only add the links to the gh-pages branch and have a separate master branch or not, I can see the advantages/disadvantages both of you are mentioning. 

Given that @gked is on holidays, I don't have much of an opinion, and the next call is in more than week, does that mean that this is up the the WG chairs to decide? I take it that it is rather urgent to resolve the issue of dead links in the HTML spec.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/pull/262#issuecomment-638444924