Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] First-Party Sets (#342)

Connected to governance, there are also issues of bias that need to be looked into around this proposal, as documented by my issue on the [explainer](https://github.com/krgovind/first-party-sets/issues/14) and follow-up on [discourse](https://discourse.wicg.io/t/proposal-first-party-sets/3331/3).  These biases could be addressed by being more permissive and finding another solution to governance of FPS, or could be more restrictive (proposed by another commenter on [discourse](https://discourse.wicg.io/t/proposal-first-party-sets/3331/3)) and really have very limited usage so users are not concerned.

Per @jwrosewell comment above, it's important to note that privacy, while important, is not the singular factor that should be used for making all decisions. The [draft success criteria](https://github.com/w3c/web-advertising/blob/master/success-criteria.md) layout the other stakeholders and scenarios that need to be taken into account around decisions that affect the viability of a thriving and diverse open web.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/342#issuecomment-637833458