- From: L. David Baron <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:50:07 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 20 July 2020 23:50:19 UTC
> * Maybe we also implement `<style disabled>`, behaving the same as `<link>`? That may be nice, though on the other hand the "explicitly enabled" stuff is a bit hackish, so not a fan of making it apply to all `LinkStyle`s... Still may be a better end state. That seems somewhat problematic given the existence of `disabled` on `HTMLStyleElement`, since it would be weird to add a `disabled` attribute to `<style>` without having it reflected to JS as `disabled`. So it seems like the solution of having `disabled` on `<link>` be a totally different thing from what it is on `<style>` is probably less horrible than the compatible alternatives. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/519#issuecomment-661454573
Received on Monday, 20 July 2020 23:50:19 UTC