Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] IndexedDB putAll (#536)

> this API is asynchronous and uses the existing 'onsuccess' and 'onerror' event handling present in IndexedDB. I've updated the explainer to be more clear on this.

Thanks for following up on this. There is an inherent risk of inconsistency in the API surface, but could a non-event based asynchronous design be considered here? The event based design I believe that IDB has predates idiomatic async patterns in JS, so it made sense back then but it feels a bit strange to continue with that pattern for a new-ish API.

> In the future considerations section I mentioned an addAll() which could possibly have similar behavior to putAll() except it would throw an error on duplicate insertion like add().

We'll look into this and provide further feedback. Thank you for the info.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/536#issuecomment-661414973