Re: [w3c/manifest] Example suggests that `icons` `sizes` mean a minimum size, but normative text doesn't support that (#925) from Matt Giuca on 2020-07-20 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from July 2020)

From: Matt Giuca <notifications@github.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 22:10:13 -0700
To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/issues/925/660805239@github.com>

Interesting. So is it not intended to be used for single-image formats like PNG and SVG? Several examples throughout the spec disagree...

I think it is useful to have it mean what I said above, since that way, you can have a manifest with 12 icons of various sizes, and the UA can just download the one that it needs for a particular surface, based on the `sizes` hint, and not have to download all the icons to check their internal size.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/925#issuecomment-660805239

Received on Monday, 20 July 2020 05:10:26 UTC