Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation limits on keys (#344)

@kaizhu256 How about filing a bug at https://crbug.com/new explaining your situation? I'm curious to learn why you need large *keys*.

Starting in Chrome 84, we've significantly improved how we handle large *values*. Based on what I know about databases used as backing stores for IndexedDB, I'm hoping to drive the web ecosystem towards *small keys*, where "small" means at most kilobytes in length. This is because keys show up in indexes, and key length directly impacts the performance of all database operations.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/344#issuecomment-660578854

Received on Sunday, 19 July 2020 03:16:59 UTC