- From: Matt Giuca <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 23:13:17 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 17 July 2020 06:13:30 UTC
@sunggook That's a useful taxonomy, thanks for sharing. Yes, in general I am advocating that we move away from 1, recommend 2 wherever possible and 3 as a fallback. 2 offers the least direct control over how things will behave on each specific platform, but that's _exactly the point_. Web developers are not supposed to be deciding "on Windows, it should do this, on macOS it should do that." The entire point of the Web is to be a fairly tight abstraction over the host OS. The browser manufacturer should decide what to do on Windows or on macOS; the web developer should supply enough generic metadata that the browser can do something reasonable. We aren't aiming to provide developers with 100% control over the application, just as we don't give developers 100% capabilities they would expect from a native binary. We provide a reasonable trade-off between control and portability. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/856#issuecomment-659883080
Received on Friday, 17 July 2020 06:13:30 UTC