- From: L. David Baron <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 13:57:38 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2020 20:57:50 UTC
I'm curious what led to the design of the fallback ordering. It seems a little strange for the existing `display` value to be the last in the priority order since it's the only one that existing implementations would handle. It's also possible that this could be fixed by changing the recommended authoring practices (relative to what's used in the current examples) rather than by changing the processing model. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/530#issuecomment-655753070
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2020 20:57:50 UTC