- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 01:10:58 -0700
- To: whatwg/storage <storage@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2020 08:11:10 UTC
I think the problem is that you are putting a lot of weight on text that had no implementer commitments or tests to begin with. I agree we should have implementer agreement though, so maybe @inexorabletash can chime in. 1: I suppose we could allow removal for "security reasons", but it seems rather arbitrary. Do we actually have a concrete scenario where a user agent does this? 3: Consider Firefox confirmed. 4: Consider Firefox confirmed. We also only ever had it for IDB as far as I'm aware. I guess it should be fairly easy to write a demo for these APIs though so I'll give that a shot. 5: It does require a particular UI, it suggests that it should have storage size. The new text simply suggests you should be able to clear sites, not what you have to display about them. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/storage/issues/95#issuecomment-654677318
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2020 08:11:10 UTC