Re: [w3c/manifest] Clarify behaviour of a page linking to a manifest that is not within scope of that manifest (#784)

Refreshing myself on this discussion, the original proposal that we had discussed still make sense. It would also make sense if, for example, one was at "example.com/about" or just "example.com/" and start_url was in scope:

```JSON
{
   "start_url": "/pwa/",
   "scope": "/pwa/"
}
```

so then it's a matter of invalidating the manifest if the computed start_url no longer in scope, right? 


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/784#issuecomment-653366747