- From: Matt Giuca <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 22:58:01 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/pull/834/review/441369460@github.com>
@mgiuca commented on this pull request. > @@ -304,6 +304,10 @@ <h2> </li> </ul> </li> + <li>Otherwise, if |manifest|["{{WebAppManifest/start_url}}"] is not + present, or not <a>same origin</a> as the {{Document}}'s + {{Document/URL}}, consider the document not <a>installable</a>. OK, I've updated the PR. I filed a bug #912 about the above issue (wherein Marcos and I agree, we shouldn't have "installability of the document") but I haven't tackled it here. I've updated the text so the UA can now either consider the document not installable, OR can use the document URL to replace the off-origin start_url. And I've updated the commit description. Actually, this is no longer a breaking change (!). You can carry on behaving exactly as before, if you like, which is replacing an invalid or off-origin start_url with the document URL, or you can error out (newly allowed behaviour). In one sense, this is now just a (useful) refactor, moving the replace-start-with-document logic up out of the manifest processor and into the "steps to determine installability of the document". The next step in #912 will be rewriting those steps to be about postprocessing the manifest, not determining installability. @marcoscaceres how is this? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/834#discussion_r448764694
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2020 05:58:15 UTC