Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Trusted Types (#198)

Hi @mikewest et al,

We're coming back to this, finally (apologies!). 

We had a read through the [intent to ship thread](https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/Il-wfnw9TAw/m/JRt5MTXHDAAJ), and noted that the intent was paused in November to take a look at:

> - DOM node manipulation and the <script> tag.
> - [Extensibility](https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/241)
> - Developer support / Support by Frameworks

We couldn't find issues for the first and third of those topics; could you possibly give us a pointer?

We also noticed that there was a recent update to that thread specifically calling out the Extensibility issue as having been addressed, as well as the default policy issue (was that in addition to the above three issues, or a rephrasing of one of them?) 

Was the Extensibility issue resolved to the satisfaction of the Mozilla folks who raised concerns? (@annevk may know more here.)

What is the status of the other issue or two from the original list? 

And, is the current version of the explainer a good place for us to go to get an overview of the current state of the proposal?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/198#issuecomment-579006123