[w3ctag/design-reviews] WebXR Augmented Reality Module (#462)

Hello TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of WebXR Augmented Reality Module.

The WebXR Augmented Reality Module extends the WebXR Device API to expose the ability to create a basic augmented reality (AR) session.

  - Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): https://github.com/immersive-web/webxr-ar-module/blob/master/ar-module-explainer.md

  - Specification URL: https://immersive-web.github.io/webxr-ar-module/

  - Tests: **WIP: update incoming**
  - Security and Privacy self-review²: **WIP: update incoming**
  - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/immersive-web/webxr-ar-module

  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): 
     - Manish Goregaokar, @Manishearth, Mozilla, Editor
     - Nell Waliczek, @NellWaliczek, Amazon, Editor
     - Brandon Jones, @toji, Google, Editor
     - Ada Rose Cannon, @AdaRoseCannon, Samsung, Chair
     - Chris Wilson, @cwilso, Google, Chair
  - Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: N/A (Immersive Web WG)
  - Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: N/A
  - External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status):
    - Chrome Status: https://chromestatus.com/feature/5450241148977152


Further details:

  - [X] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/)
  - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: N/A
  - The group where the work on this specification is being done: Immersive Web WG
  - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: N/A
  - This work is being funded by: N/A

You should also know that...

  - This specification was split from the WebXR specification recently and has been designed as a modbule/extension.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

  🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for **each point of feedback**

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/462