- From: ExE Boss <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 14:10:29 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Sunday, 12 January 2020 22:10:31 UTC
Well, [there’s the `isCallable` proposal](https://github.com/caitp/TC39-Proposals/blob/master/tc39-reflect-isconstructor-iscallable.md), which intends to return `false` for class constructors. This also affects @ljharb’s [is‑callable](https://github.com/inspect-js/is-callable) package, which returns `true` for native implementations, but returns `false` for **WebIDL2JS** implementations. --- See also: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-function-implementation-hiding/issues/43 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/831#issuecomment-573462873
Received on Sunday, 12 January 2020 22:10:31 UTC