Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Personalization Semantics Explainer and  Module 1 (#476)

Dear Alice:

Thank you for raising Issue #476 asking about duplication between
Distraction in our Module 1 specification draft and CSS' Media Queries
5 (MQ5).

We have spent a good deal of time considering this in our past several
teleconferences and have come to the following conclusions:

While there is some overlap distraction is much more
comprehensive than MQ5. However, our examples have inadvertently
focussed on the overlap, not the broader scope supported in our
specification. We are creating new examples to remedy this.

We have decided to let the overlap stand for now rather than to
try and split out the items covered in MQ5. As this is all new
technology, we feel this is more appropriate at this stage.
Let's see how developers and content authors apply both our
spec and MQ5.

Thanks again for bringing this overlap to our attention. We had not
previously addressed it in our conversations, and we do need to be aware
of the overlap and prepared to respond substantively when questions like
yours come up.

Best,

Lisa and Sharon
Personalization TF Facilitators

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/476#issuecomment-744543871