Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use new Streams algorithms (#1085)

@domenic commented on this pull request.



> @@ -4990,20 +4801,20 @@ Range Requests</cite>. [[HTTP-RANGE]] However, this is not widely supported by b
          <li><p>If <var>bytes</var> is failure, then <a lt=terminated for=fetch>terminate</a> the
          ongoing fetch.
 
-         <li><p><a for=ReadableStream>Enqueue bytes</a> given <var>bytes</var> and
-         <var>stream</var>.
+         <li><p><a for=ReadableStream>Enqueue</a> a {{Uint8Array}} wrapping an {{ArrayBuffer}}

I don't think adding the redundant "object" is a good idea. Ultimately it's your spec so the editorial conventions are up to you, but I wouldn't want to see that carry over to HTML, for example.

I agree that eventually we want something better here in Web IDL.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1085#discussion_r479347327