- From: Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:01:46 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 28 August 2020 03:01:58 UTC
@rniwa commented on this pull request. > @@ -3594,6 +3625,60 @@ run these steps: <ol> <li><p>Assert: either <var>addedNodes</var> or <var>removedNodes</var> <a for=set>is not empty</a>. + <li><p>If either <var>options</var>'s' {{MutationObserverInit/elementLocalNameFilter}} or + {{MutationObserverInit/elementHasAttributeNameFilter}} is present, then: + + <ol> + <li><p>Let <var>nodeAttributesList</var> be <var>nodeAttributesList</var> of the node's attributes, "<code>node.getAttributeNames()</code>". No, these normative text shouldn't be written as JavaScript or invoking other DOM API. We should probably just say Let nodeAttributesList be the set of local names of node's attributes. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/885#discussion_r478804016
Received on Friday, 28 August 2020 03:01:58 UTC