Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831)

> > I'm pretty sure I've said this in the past but we consider the integration of _closed_ shadow roots with custom elements as a **must have**. We can't support this proposal unless that is spec'ed out. Otherwise, this feature provides zero benefit for developers who are using closed shadow trees.
> 
> @rniwa I believe we have defined a path forward for closed shadow roots support, mostly explained here: https://github.com/mfreed7/declarative-shadow-dom/blob/master/README.md#existing-declarative-shadow-roots. Do you think we need to have that part spec'd as well or can we just keep it as a separate feature associated to element internals?

Yes, that part definitely needs to be spec'ed out. Recall that our position has been that people should be always using closed shadow roots, not open shadow roots. Without this part being figured out, all basis and arguments to have declarative shadow roots is basically moot.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/831#issuecomment-671735970