- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:36:29 -0700
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 10 August 2020 20:36:42 UTC
@domenic commented on this pull request. > + <li> + If the options have changed and the new options are supported the pointer lock <a>target</a> + must be updated to this element, the new options must be used, a <a>pointerlockchange</a> + event sent, and the promise must <a>resolve</a>. + </li> + </ol> + </li> + <li> + If any element (including this one), whose <a>shadow-including + root</a> is same as this element's <a>shadow-including root</a>, is + already locked (or pending lock) the pointer lock <a>target</a> + must be updated to this element, a <a>pointerlockchange</a> + event sent and the promise must <a>Resolve</a>. + </li> + <li data-link-for="Document"> + If the request was not started from an <a>engagement gesture</a> and Hmm, that seems like a really unfortunate divergence... but that's a separate issue from this update, I guess. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/49#discussion_r468171017
Received on Monday, 10 August 2020 20:36:42 UTC