[w3ctag/design-reviews] Screen Wake Lock API (#543)

Saluton TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of [Screen Wake Lock API](https://w3c.github.io/screen-wake-lock/).

This document specifies an API that allows web applications to request a screen wake lock. Under the right conditions, and if allowed, the screen wake lock prevents the system from turning off a device's screen.

  - Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/screen-wake-lock/

  - Tests: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/screen-wake-lock

  - Security and Privacy self-review: https://w3c.github.io/screen-wake-lock/#security-and-privacy-considerations

  - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/screen-wake-lock

  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
      - Anssi Kostiainen (@anssiko), Intel
      - Fuqiao Xue (@xfq), W3C
      - Reilly Grant (@reillyeon), Google
  - Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: Intel, Mozilla
  - Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/32


Further details:

  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/)
  - The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: [W3C DAS WG](https://www.w3.org/das/)
  - The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done (if current group is a community group or other incubation venue):
  - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification:
  - This work is being funded by: 

You should also know that...

Changes since the last CR: https://w3c.github.io/screen-wake-lock/#changes-20171214


We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

  ☂️ open a single issue in our GitHub repo **for the entire review**


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/543