Re: [heycam/webidl] add a type to represent the undefined value (#60)

> `undefined foo()` sounds quite like a syntactically prefixed function like `async foo()`, one of the reasons I find it weird.

On its own, yeah, I'd probably agree with you. But IDL already has `DOMString foo()`, etc. (As you mention in your last post.) So I think it's fine.

And since everyone seems to have switched over, I'm fine with `undefined` too.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/60#issuecomment-668825698