- From: Gary Kacmarcik <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 17:14:23 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/uievents <uievents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2020 17:14:37 UTC
Hmm.. I guess I was answering the question from the title "should input be in same event loop as keypress" with "we could define input in same loop as keydown; and keypress in same loop as keydown" (or something like that) so that the definitions are relative to non-deprecated events. But once there's a proper algorithm, then it doesn't make sense to think of it that way. Since it would be written more like: * fire keydown in event loop X * fire input in event loop X * fire keypress in event loop X Sorry about the confusion there. To more directly answer your question, we can't remove `keypress` and it needs to be included in the spec, I just want to ensure that it can (in theory) be removed without breaking the spec. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/238#issuecomment-668719726
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2020 17:14:37 UTC