Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] jxl Content-Encoding (#541)

The format could be used for encoding any type of data. So it fits the definition of HTTP Content-Encoding.
 It is unlikely that the compression ratio will surpass the compression ratio of gzip / brotli unless content is a JPEG file.

The volume of JPEGs traffic is bigger than total volume of HTML, CSS and JS traffic.
jxl Content-Encoding will cover the weaknesses of gzip and brotli for such kind of traffic.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/541#issuecomment-668488407

Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2020 09:26:21 UTC