Re: [whatwg/fetch] A new Request(input, init) constructor step sounds weird. (#1061)

But disturbed/locked also does a non-null check so that part is covered, no? (We could make step 38 step 39.0 I suppose and assert that _input_'s body is non-null, but would that make it better?)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1061#issuecomment-668424418

Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2020 07:15:25 UTC