- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:12:58 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 3 August 2020 22:13:12 UTC
> As an aside: Having to have two sibling typedefs, one with [EnforceRange] and one without it, seems bad for clarity. In general I find the extensive use of typedefs in the Web GL specs pretty bad for clarity. They're working against the Web IDL type system, which assumes everyone will use a common vocabulary for things like `unsigned long`, instead of typedefing primitives. So it's understandable that you'll run into trouble when working in that type of situation. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/842#issuecomment-668267003
Received on Monday, 3 August 2020 22:13:12 UTC