Re: [whatwg/storage] Allow 'session' bucket (#71)

I don't really want to have to implement the copying behavior for other storage systems, if I can avoid it... But also agree that it does seem weird to have two different kinds of "session" storage.

What use cases are we envisioning for session storage for other storage systems? Do those use cases actually require the cloning behavior? I think my initial inclination would be that we don't want this cloning for anything other than the "legacy" session storage API.

Not sure what the difference would be between each API getting its own session bucket, vs multiple APIs sharing the same session bucket?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/storage/issues/71#issuecomment-621998482

Received on Thursday, 30 April 2020 17:36:22 UTC