Re: [heycam/webidl] Add bigint type (#525)

Right, if we don't want to permit bigint as an actual IDL type, we should make certain changes to WebIDL to let it "pass through". I've been hoping that this patch would land, so I didn't formulate another one for that subset. (I think WebIDL is just sort of incoherent right now, with BigInt existing as a type in JS.)

I've heard from a few people in the TAG that they are interested in this patch landing. Comments here about why would be appreciated. @cynthia @kenchris

If we *conclude* that this patch won't land, then let's formulate that more minimal patch and land that instead.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/525#issuecomment-621809063