Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow BigInts as IndexedDB keys (#231)

It's a reasonable enhancement for completeness, but adding new type support to keys implies potentially non-trivial enhancements to whatever the implementation is using for comparator/ordering purposes.  Given https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/231#issuecomment-368863760 this does seem like a high cost/benefit ratio compared to other implementation and spec concerns.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/231#issuecomment-621742159