Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Content Indexing API (#496)

> is this intended to go from WICG into the Service Workers working group? 

I think the Web Applications Working Group is a better fit for this API.

> Doesn't this link to the new image resource spec proposal, instead of web app manifest?

It does now :) I was waiting for the image resource TAG review to go through.

I also added an Abuse Considerations section in the explainer: https://github.com/wicg/content-index#abuse-considerations

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/496#issuecomment-621329634