Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Scheme-bound Cookies (#483)

@mikewest thank you for providing additional informaiton which prompts three follow on quesitons.

1. HTTPS is an architectural prerequisite – has the impact of the wide spread use of HTTPs been assessed from the perspective of carbon footprint, diversity, competition, trust, performance and the open web among others? If not, it should be before this and other proposals which rely on the acceptance of HTTPS are reviewed.

2. Supporting data – what evidence does TAG require to assess the impact? The data provided in the explainer was presented for the purpose of establishing lifetime. Further and different data will be needed to assess impact.

3. Stakeholder review – as the proposal progresses consultation will be required with those who use the technology in addition to browser and technology vendors. What activity is planned in this regard?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/483#issuecomment-616982656