Re: [whatwg/streams] Specifying QueuingStrategies in WebIDL (#1005)

Hmm, but if we make them normal methods, then we have to do similar tricks to what we're doing for UnderlyingSource/UnderlyingSink dictionaries. I.e. convert to a QueuingStrategy dictionary in prose and save the original object. So the simplicity gains are not as nice as I thought. OK, maybe I'll just continue with the current path...

Alternately we could add infrastructure to Web IDL to allow invoking methods of a dictionary on the original object, somehow, to handle both cases. But I'm not sure that's a good idea.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/1005#issuecomment-614670524