Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Add accessibility section (#327)

Awesome, thanks for the links. The checklist will provide a good format, even if mostly enumerating that this API does not have most of the relevant features.

Note that user agents are likely to have some user interface elements associated with storage APIs even when the storage APIs do not define them - such as developer tools, or for end users to see which sites are storing data. I called that out in a draft PR.





-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/327#issuecomment-612230992