Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] SM series algorithms in Web Cryptography (#491)

To expand on @dbaron's question, in order to do a review of this work we need to understand its provenance and how you expect it to / hope it will progress along the standards track.

## Provenance

* What is your organizational affiliation, @smx-gotoweb?
* What organization or project is driving the design?
* Who is funding this work?

## Progression along the standards track

* What is the group in which the incubation/design work on this is being done (or is intended to be done in the future)?
* What is the group in which standardization of this work is intended to be done?

On this last question, and though the [Web Cryptography Working Group](https://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/) is closed, my understanding is that "discussion around current and future work for the Web Crypto API should be happening on the <a href="mailto:public-web-security@w3.org">public-web-security@w3.org</a> mailing list" (according to [the email announcing the WG's closure](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2017Feb/0002.html)).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/491#issuecomment-611194166