Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Data for measuring audio-video synchronization and end-to-end delay in realtime communications (#493)

OK that makes sense, just wanted to make sure we were not trying to address one resource-related problem by remedying a different resource-related problem.

Can you help clarify?
1. Is asking for wider review a requirement of TAG or a suggestion if wider review is deemed necessary? (Was it just deemed necessary?)
2. What does "the first place to go would be [dispatch](https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dispatch/about/)" mean in terms of next steps? E-mail dispatch@ietf.org asking to take a look?

I want to make sure this moves forward so that we don't wait for TAG review but TAG review waits for us to contact experts and then we wait for each other.

If more in-depth reviewing is a requirement I could also try poking contacts at Firefox, Safari and Edge asking if they can give a formal review.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/493#issuecomment-610760661