- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 20:10:13 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Sunday, 29 September 2019 03:10:36 UTC
> but it seems like this ought to be invalid since {} is not a valid A That would be an option, yes. > = null seems like it should equally not work. Per spec that does not work, right. > Does this allow a to be "A or undefined"? It allows `a` to be not present (that is the `Get()` on the JS object returns `undefined`), but if it's present (any other value is returned) then it only allows values that can be converted to `A` without failing. Chrome's bindings generator has all sorts of bugs around dictionaries, so I wouldn't base too much on what it does, but the desire for the `dictionary C { A a; }` case where `A` has required members and allowing `{}` to be passed for a `C` instance was present in a number of specs, so the IDL spec explicitly allows that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/750#issuecomment-536244035
Received on Sunday, 29 September 2019 03:10:36 UTC