Re: [w3c/manifest] Clarify behaviour of a page linking to a manifest that is not within scope of that manifest (#784)

Note that @marcoscaceres @dominickng and I agreed that we can proceed with this. Marcos related that this was the original intention behind the spec, it just wasn't explicit.

Specifically, change number 1 (explicitly allow the manifest to be installed from a page outside of scope) is just a clarification and doesn't make a normative change. Change number 2 (explicitly ban the manifest from applying to documents outside of scope) is a normative change, but should be quite uncontroversial since it's pretty obvious that it shouldn't apply.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/784#issuecomment-535784214