- From: Doug Turner <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 18:15:31 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2019 01:15:53 UTC
> We took this up during a breakout during the Tokyo F2F. I second the remarks @kenchris made above. Comments and questions follow: > > 1. This should probably be a feature that only works on the currently focused window. Yes, that is what we're doing in Chrome. When the window loses focus, we stop the scan. > 2. Otherwise, normative reject conditions under race would be extremely helpful for other implementors (e.g. two tabs scanning at the same time - is this possible?) Yes, you can have two tabs scanning at the same time. > 3. We'd be more happy if this feature was a active tab (Point 1 in this list) only feature, as it can be power consuming for mobile devices and has privacy consideration. A visual indicator (like we do with audio) when scanning could be useful. Agreed about active tab/window only. The visual indicator is a nice idea, but it's not something that I think we should spec out. > 4. Following those thoughts, a grace period for blurred tabs (e.g. if user moved focus to a different tab for more than n seconds right after starting a scan, stop scanning) sounds like a potential mitigation for racing (or wasting resources) while adding some safety. I do not follow this thought. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/333#issuecomment-533841582
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2019 01:15:53 UTC