Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444)

With the changes in https://github.com/tc39/proposal-top-level-await/pull/128 and https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/4352, I believe this implements the new semantics.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1444#issuecomment-533482772

Received on Friday, 20 September 2019 09:34:12 UTC