Re: [w3c/manifest] Clarify behaviour of a page linking to a manifest that is not within scope of that manifest (#784)

+1 to Matt here.

The other problem is that there's no guarantee that the `start_url` referenced by the `<a>` is under a service worker. Ergonomically, it seems like using an `<a install="">` should mean that the current page need not have either a manifest or a SW, but then we'd have to load the linked-to page anyway to see if a service worker is going to be present (or alternatively implement the `serviceworker` member which no engine yet supports).

`rel=alternate` appears to be interpreted as an internationalisation feature. What specifically were you thinking of there?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/784#issuecomment-533440298