Re: [w3c/manifest] Required WebAppManifest Member clarification (#799)

Thanks! yeah, I saw some of that on Chrome's docs. For my use cause sticking with spec is fine because we're not trying to tell user's what to be compatible with. I've debated extracting the `@hapi/joi` object out into an NPM package for use by others. If I do so, I could create modified versions that are browser specific or just throw a warning on validation that not including something means it won't be compatible with a specific browser.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/799#issuecomment-533396312