Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Specification status report for TPAC 2019 (#138)

> Please can you respond to this comment with a brief specifications status report for the WebApps meeting at TPAC. The report should address the following:
> 
> * What progress has your spec made in the last 12 months?

Added some convenience read methods to `Blob` (`Blob.text()`, `Blob.arrayBuffer()` and `Blob.stream()`), and cleaned up some of the spec text around the FileReader API.

> * Is anything blocking your spec from moving to CR?

(not entirely sure what consequences are from moving to CR, but) there is a bunch of work left cleaning up the spec text, particularly around `Blob.type`. And it would be nice to get feature requests such as #140 in as well. Other than that I think the spec is fairly stable and I don't anticipate any major changes.

> * If yes, what is your plan to unblock it and do you need any help?
> * What do you want to achieve for your spec in the next two days (of breakout sessions)?

See also #137. Mainly go through open issues and figure 

> 
> We're tracking these status reports in [WebApps issue #19](https://github.com/w3c/webappswg/issues/19)
> 
> Thanks.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/FileAPI/issues/138#issuecomment-532017456