- From: Matt Giuca <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:53:12 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 16 September 2019 04:53:34 UTC
We are discussing this on WICG/badging#51. Is there a TAG consensus on this (roughly, on the changes outlined in [A Case For Separation](https://github.com/WICG/badging/blob/master/explainer.md#a-case-for-separation) which are expanded on with the new new explainer rewrite in that PR? Also, which work mode would TAG prefer: * Us landing changes directly into the explainer even though they don't have consensus, so that the explainer can be discussed as a proposal in itself, or * Us posting PRs and reaching consensus on there before updating the explainer (the current work mode)? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/387#issuecomment-531640701
Received on Monday, 16 September 2019 04:53:34 UTC