- From: Andrew Sutherland <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:51:12 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Sunday, 15 September 2019 18:51:34 UTC
Re-run with `retrying`/similar attribute sounds good. We should also consider adding something like BackgroundSync's SyncEvent's `lastChance` [attribute](https://wicg.github.io/BackgroundSync/spec/#dom-syncevent-lastchance) as it's unlikely an implementation would want to perform an infinite number of retries and it might help non-bad-actor ServiceWorkers report in that they're having trouble and/or have them skip inessential steps. Bad-actors would presumably just be mitigated by only re-dispatching "activate" when the ServiceWorker would be eligible for having an event dispatched at it normally and maintaining existing lifetime limits based on that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1372#issuecomment-531589846
Received on Sunday, 15 September 2019 18:51:34 UTC