- From: hober <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:34:22 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2019 00:34:45 UTC
> We'll follow the rules set out in [Unicode Standard Annex #29](http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/#Word_Boundaries) supplemented by a word dictionary as done by the ICU Project's [boundary analysis](http://userguide.icu-project.org/boundaryanalysis). I'm a bit worried about interop here. Are you effectively requiring all browser engines to use ICU? If not, how can we ensure interoperability in a world where the word dictionary isn't specified / standardized? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/392#issuecomment-530171192
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2019 00:34:45 UTC